also, if we had equalised at any point, the rest of the game would
have been very different. Spurs would have upped the pace, we would have sat back and tried to hold on.
As it was, we didn't force them to get out of second gear.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on December 5th 2021 at 16:02:05
Message Thread
- Don’t even think we deserved to lose that, let alone three nil (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 16:00:02
- They were at 50% Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 5, 16:20:12
- They weren’t. We played pretty well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 17:02:41
- We did deserve to lose that, they were toying with us (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Dec 5, 16:11:05
- They were, seen it so many times did enough to get a result (n/m) (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Dec 5, 17:03:37
- No they weren’t. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 17:02:14
- Cmon Jim. Spurs could have had 5. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 5, 16:01:13
- So could we. Was a very even game really (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 16:05:32
- The fact we miss sitters is reason we deserve to lose. (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Dec 5, 16:01:03
- We deserved to lose because we missed those sitters (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:00:59
- also, if we had equalised at any point, the rest of the game would (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 16:02:05
- Maybe, but the pressure would have been in them and there would have been more space too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:02:44
- Thrashed us without playing particularly well (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 16:03:57
- Maybe, but the pressure would have been in them and there would have been more space too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:02:44
- also, if we had equalised at any point, the rest of the game would (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 16:02:05
- They were at 50% Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 5, 16:20:12
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.