Cmon Jim. Spurs could have had 5.
Posted By: SeattleSounders on December 5th 2021 at 16:01:13
Message Thread
- Don’t even think we deserved to lose that, let alone three nil (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 16:00:02
- They were at 50% Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 5, 16:20:12
- They weren’t. We played pretty well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 17:02:41
- We did deserve to lose that, they were toying with us (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Dec 5, 16:11:05
- They were, seen it so many times did enough to get a result (n/m) (NCFC) - littletinyphil, Dec 5, 17:03:37
- No they weren’t. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 17:02:14
- Cmon Jim. Spurs could have had 5. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 5, 16:01:13
- So could we. Was a very even game really (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 5, 16:05:32
- The fact we miss sitters is reason we deserve to lose. (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Dec 5, 16:01:03
- We deserved to lose because we missed those sitters (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:00:59
- also, if we had equalised at any point, the rest of the game would (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 16:02:05
- Maybe, but the pressure would have been in them and there would have been more space too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:02:44
- Thrashed us without playing particularly well (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 16:03:57
- Maybe, but the pressure would have been in them and there would have been more space too (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 5, 16:02:44
- also, if we had equalised at any point, the rest of the game would (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 16:02:05
- They were at 50% Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Dec 5, 16:20:12
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.