I would probably choose Lampard over Smith.
But that's not based on a lot other than gut feeling and/or the prospect of something different.
Posted By: AstroCanary on November 11th 2021 at 23:21:30
Message Thread
- We've got nothing to lose. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 22:50:14
- Looks the opposite to me, plenty of options, we just seem to be looking at the out of work (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:03:54
- Who would you pick? (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:04:41
- I'd have Lampard of the candidates (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:08:30
- My post wasn't an anti-Lampard post (even if he's not my first choice) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:13:08
- I just don't think Smith will be any different to Farke. If we're making the change then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:20:01
- I would probably choose Lampard over Smith. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:21:30
- I just don't think Smith will be any different to Farke. If we're making the change then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:20:01
- My post wasn't an anti-Lampard post (even if he's not my first choice) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:13:08
- I'd have Lampard of the candidates (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:08:30
- Who would you pick? (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:04:41
- Looks the opposite to me, plenty of options, we just seem to be looking at the out of work (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:03:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.