We've got nothing to lose.
That's pretty much it. Lampard wouldn't have been my first choice but it's not like there are a load of options out there! Having thought about it the worst case scenario at the end of this season is no worse than the direction we were headed, anyway.
Posted By: AstroCanary on November 11th 2021 at 22:50:14
Message Thread
- We've got nothing to lose. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 22:50:14
- Looks the opposite to me, plenty of options, we just seem to be looking at the out of work (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:03:54
- Who would you pick? (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:04:41
- I'd have Lampard of the candidates (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:08:30
- My post wasn't an anti-Lampard post (even if he's not my first choice) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:13:08
- I just don't think Smith will be any different to Farke. If we're making the change then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:20:01
- I would probably choose Lampard over Smith. (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:21:30
- I just don't think Smith will be any different to Farke. If we're making the change then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:20:01
- My post wasn't an anti-Lampard post (even if he's not my first choice) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:13:08
- I'd have Lampard of the candidates (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:08:30
- Who would you pick? (n/m) (NCFC) - AstroCanary, Nov 11, 23:04:41
- Looks the opposite to me, plenty of options, we just seem to be looking at the out of work (NCFC) - thirsty work, Nov 11, 23:03:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.