To be fair...

(And bear in mind I am one who thinks Hugill was (a) underused early on (b) unfortunate with injury timing (c) hampered by his own desperation to impress (d) taking on the role assumed of him rather than trying to be something more useful to us) Sargent showed more quality, mobility and integration in 60 mins vs Watford that Hugill did in any minute of his time with us.

Posted By: trafford_canary on September 23rd 2021 at 10:52:11

Message Thread

Out of Hughill and Idhah (NCFC) - ingi, Sep 23, 08:00:14
- neither good enough, let's be honest (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 23, 11:59:44
  - True should of cashed in on Hugill but Idah needs to play regularly. (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, Sep 23, 13:33:14
- 100% (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Sep 23, 11:10:04
- Was thinking this yesterday. Would have benefited all concerned (n/m) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Sep 23, 08:12:38
  - Yes very hard to discern how good he actually is (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Sep 23, 10:38:32
- completely agree. was surpised to to Hughill leave.... (n/m) (NCFC) - shoddy, Sep 23, 08:09:54
  - He wanted to go (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Sep 23, 09:21:03
    - Because we told him he wouldn't play (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Sep 23, 09:53:35
      - To be fair... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Sep 23, 10:52:11
        
        He was out of his depth in the championship let alone premier league (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 23, 12:20:27
  - I was surprised only because somebody took him (n/m) (NCFC) - Legacy Fan, Sep 23, 09:20:16
- I assume one of the reasons we wanted to keep Idah was for his pace (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 23, 08:03:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.