It’s not irrelevant is it because if the keeper wasn’t ever going to play the ball then

Cantwell didn’t prevent him from being able to play the ball. Did he?

For him to be interfering with play his presence in the keepers line of sight (which in itself isn’t clear as the ball was above them) needs to have prevented the keeper from being able to play the ball.

Posted By: Jim on August 29th 2021 at 19:12:24

Message Thread

Wouldn't it be a bit odd if Todd's offside (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 10:57:30
- Exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 12:45:23
- Shirley, now as a keeper at a corner, you should be (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Aug 29, 12:03:19
  - And it hasn’t (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 12:54:59
  - Just don't be offside when you do it (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 29, 12:10:19
    - That (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 12:22:33
- What about a 40 yard strike when the offside player is inline with the keeper and shooter (NCFC) - Farkeball, Aug 29, 11:02:14
  - Denied (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:23:06
  - What if Gordon Banks in goal? (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:05:37
- It’s whether he prevents him from being able to save it (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 11:00:29
  - No it isnt (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 29, 11:07:50
    - Sorry but you are wrong (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 13:07:15
      - He’s not fucking wrong (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:09:56
        
        Read the rule then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:48:43
        
        Which he was doing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 17:43:30
        
        No he wasn’t. No way the keeper was getting anywhere near that (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 18:01:05
        
        Irrelevant whether he’d have got near it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 18:24:07
        
        It’s not irrelevant is it because if the keeper wasn’t ever going to play the ball then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 19:12:24
      - Look at P205 of the second PDF on that page (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Aug 29, 13:56:00
        
        I don’t agree but it’s done now (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 14:11:18
        
        You’ll find a way to complain against any decision against us (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:15:22
        
        No I won’t. But I can actually read the laws of the game unlike many other seems (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:49:32
        
        Shame you can’t understand them eh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 17:48:36
    - That makes more sense (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:29:44
  - So better goalkeepers, or taller, are more likely to get decision? (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:04:18
- Base it on Football Manager stats. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 29, 11:00:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.