No he wasn’t. No way the keeper was getting anywhere near that
That is a judgment they needed to make and they didn’t.
I don’t even accept he was in his line of sight given the ball was in the air above them both and the linesman was in no position to judge. Again, not checked.
Posted By: Jim on August 29th 2021 at 18:01:05
Message Thread
- Wouldn't it be a bit odd if Todd's offside (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 10:57:30
- Exactly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 12:45:23
- Shirley, now as a keeper at a corner, you should be (NCFC) - Maillot Jaune, Aug 29, 12:03:19
- And it hasn’t (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 12:54:59
- Just don't be offside when you do it (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 29, 12:10:19
- What about a 40 yard strike when the offside player is inline with the keeper and shooter (NCFC) - Farkeball, Aug 29, 11:02:14
- Denied (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:23:06
- What if Gordon Banks in goal? (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:05:37
- It’s whether he prevents him from being able to save it (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 11:00:29
- No it isnt (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 29, 11:07:50
- Sorry but you are wrong (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 13:07:15
- He’s not fucking wrong (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:09:56
- Read the rule then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:48:43
- Which he was doing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 17:43:30
- No he wasn’t. No way the keeper was getting anywhere near that (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 18:01:05
- Irrelevant whether he’d have got near it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 18:24:07
- It’s not irrelevant is it because if the keeper wasn’t ever going to play the ball then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 19:12:24
- Irrelevant whether he’d have got near it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 18:24:07
- No he wasn’t. No way the keeper was getting anywhere near that (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 18:01:05
- Which he was doing (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 17:43:30
- Read the rule then (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:48:43
- Look at P205 of the second PDF on that page (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Aug 29, 13:56:00
- I don’t agree but it’s done now (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 14:11:18
- You’ll find a way to complain against any decision against us (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:15:22
- No I won’t. But I can actually read the laws of the game unlike many other seems (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:49:32
- Shame you can’t understand them eh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 17:48:36
- No I won’t. But I can actually read the laws of the game unlike many other seems (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 16:49:32
- You’ll find a way to complain against any decision against us (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:15:22
- I don’t agree but it’s done now (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 14:11:18
- He’s not fucking wrong (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 29, 14:09:56
- That makes more sense (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:29:44
- Sorry but you are wrong (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 29, 13:07:15
- So better goalkeepers, or taller, are more likely to get decision? (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 29, 11:04:18
- No it isnt (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 29, 11:07:50
- Base it on Football Manager stats. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 29, 11:00:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.