I do agree something doesn't look right going forward.
If you are going to play a front three those two outside players have to be able to beat a fullback and that's not Todd. Plus Rashica and Gianoulis both want to cross the ball and the only target is Pukki as no one else gets forward and heading is not in his bag of tricks.. If we are gonna play Rashica and the the young Greek boy together then I'd either play Sargent or Idah up there and either Todd or Pukki behind. Believe Pukki was actually brought in as a number 10 or maybe I'm mistaken on that.
Posted By: SeattleSounders on August 14th 2021 at 22:35:38
Message Thread
- Spent ages writing a post and i took to long so lost it. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:04:15
- I do agree something doesn't look right going forward. (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:35:38
- I think Pukki was brought in as a second striker not a 9 (that was Rhodes) but struck gold (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:45:54
- So much no. Wow that is as bad as it gets (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Aug 14, 22:15:23
- 10/11 players that started tonight ="Wow that is as bad as it gets"? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:33:03
- I don't think I've ever disagreed with a post more than this one... (NCFC) - mrleelee, Aug 14, 22:11:41
- Todd at CM ... what could possibly etc? (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:14:07
- Expand on that... (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:15:08
- Well ... (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:19:03
- Did you actually read the article? He specifically says he doesn't want to be a head coach (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:31:26
- But he would give no defensive cover? (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:36:15
- Watch the first two Liverpool goals and notice what Billy offers defensively (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:58:35
- In truth we need a genuine skipp replacement (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 23:09:09
- Yep. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 23:18:09
- In truth we need a genuine skipp replacement (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 23:09:09
- Did Gilmour? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:49:36
- Not sure ... but then again, we conceded 3! (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:53:30
- 😁 We look short of athleticism in midfield without Skipp that is apparent (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 23:01:29
- Not sure ... but then again, we conceded 3! (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:53:30
- Watch the first two Liverpool goals and notice what Billy offers defensively (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:58:35
- Huh. Weird. It kept a different message title. I'd put "did you actually read my post?" (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:32:23
- But he would give no defensive cover? (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:36:15
- Did you actually read the article? He specifically says he doesn't want to be a head coach (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:31:26
- Well ... (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:19:03
- Expand on that... (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:15:08
- You think Gilmour offered much more defensively in the centre than Todd would? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:13:41
- I can't see that line up being anything other than 4-2-4 (NCFC) - mrleelee, Aug 14, 22:35:31
- I'm afraid he's right... your midfield wouldn't survive 5 mins (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:15:19
- It's literally just Todd for Gilmour (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:16:12
- Todd at CM ... what could possibly etc? (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Aug 14, 22:14:07
- That's the most wide open team I've ever seen. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Aug 14, 22:09:39
- No, against Colchester was probably more open. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Aug 14, 23:12:17
- It's 1 player different to the one that played tonight... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:12:37
- no idea what you are talking about, not a clue. (n/m) (NCFC) - Malkybarneedledick, Aug 14, 22:08:25
- Fair. (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:13:59
- Drop Gilmour? Really? He was class today (n/m) (NCFC) - Tier2canary, Aug 14, 22:06:31
- He was fine. Not sure he was significantly better than PLM. Gave the ball away dangerously (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:10:47
- He was miles better than Melou. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:29:43
- I wouldn't even have Melou as a starter if we could find (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:46:29
- Was he? I know very little about Gilmour other than the hype. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:48:55
- Go check out the stats... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:42:49
- I wouldn't even have Melou as a starter if we could find (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:46:29
- He was miles better than Melou. (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:29:43
- He was fine. Not sure he was significantly better than PLM. Gave the ball away dangerously (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 14, 22:10:47
- I do agree something doesn't look right going forward. (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 14, 22:35:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.