Because thats just how it will be. We were screwed over by the rule in the prem before so

I have no doubt that they will now find a way to screw us over with the revised rule by exercising their discretion not to disallow goals against us.

Whilst I agree that the previous forensic analysis was ridiculous, giving discretion to the imbeciles at the PGMOL is equaly dangerous. I would have preferred to have some sort of "margin of error" zone that can be quantified (unless thats what they are doing?)

Posted By: Jim on August 13th 2021 at 13:35:38

Message Thread

doesn't give us the win denied against Spurs though (NCFC) - Farkeball, Aug 13, 11:44:11
- No doubt the new rule will be applied to the benefit of our opponants on multiple (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 13, 13:30:13
  - Probably because they'll have more chances than us (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 13, 14:13:40
  - It just seems that way because of the amount of defending we have to do. (NCFC) - Adster, Aug 13, 13:41:38
  - Because big clubs get favoured (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:31:55
    - Because thats just how it will be. We were screwed over by the rule in the prem before so (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 13, 13:35:38
      - could well get the same forensic analysis, just 5cm further up the pitch (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 13, 13:57:02
        
        But at least the edge of the new line (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:59:01
      - As long as the rules are implemented correctly (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:40:48
        
        What actually is the new rule though? Who decides whcih side of the line a scenario falls? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 13, 13:43:55
        
        Yes I’m sure whatever happens (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:45:33
- Because the rules were different then (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 12:21:53
  - Quite right but showed the rules were wrong and took a long time to correct (n/m) (NCFC) - Farkeball, Aug 13, 12:46:43
    - Yes lots of good changes since we’ve been away (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 12:58:48
      - you mean changes to VAR that everybody complained about (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 13, 13:28:06
        
        Must be why (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:30:18
        
        please dont swear (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 13, 13:32:01
        
        You slandered me, far far worse (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:32:52
        
        Apologies - you libelled me (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 13:43:07
        
        first of all you must prove that it wasn't true (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 13, 14:04:38
        
        If you mean my original post today (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 13, 14:32:38
        
        Could find the posts if I wasn’t so upset by your slurs (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 14:13:31
        
        no i haven't (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Aug 13, 13:35:29
- No it doesn’t. What a goal that was (should have been) from Pukki though (n/m) (NCFC) - DH Yellow, Aug 13, 11:54:16
  - Was correctly disallowed based on the rules at the time (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 12:22:19
    - Agree re rules but they took a long time to keep looking (NCFC) - Farkeball, Aug 13, 12:40:00
    - Football doesn't have rules. (NCFC) - Dog, Aug 13, 12:33:58
      - Oh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 13, 12:59:20
      - I've never understood the significance of that (NCFC) - jampersands, Aug 13, 12:48:33
        
        It helps when someone is patronisingly telling someone what is and isn't correct (NCFC) - Dog, Aug 13, 13:08:47

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.