I'd rather we gave them no one and no money and just got Armstrong for free

But I suspect it might not work like that.

I've no issue letting Idah go, he's not yet forced his way through, his style isn't a good fit for our system, he doesn't yet make the same intelligent runs as eg Pukki and his workrate has been called into question by people in the club. Good player but not good enough yet.

Posted By: jAC on August 4th 2021 at 20:31:26

Message Thread

ARMSTRONG??? (NCFC) - norwaay, Aug 4, 20:04:46
- Idah will hopefully be a loan deal. Stupid to get rid of him. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Aug 4, 20:29:42
- I’d rather add Hugill to the deal and keep Idah (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 4, 20:24:35
  - I'd rather we gave them no one and no money and just got Armstrong for free (NCFC) - jAC, Aug 4, 20:31:26
    - I agree with most of that, but he's a good finisher and still only 20 (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Aug 4, 20:40:41
    - How on earth have you come to that opinion on Idah?! (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Aug 4, 20:38:02
    - I think his presence up front could cause problems (n/m) (NCFC) - Duck, Aug 4, 20:34:24
  - 100% (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Aug 4, 20:28:13
    - That being said... I wouldn't be *too* upset if Idah left. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Aug 4, 20:33:01
- Stretch (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Aug 4, 20:10:41
- Can’t see it but you never know … (NCFC) - loz, Aug 4, 20:08:38
  - He's a solid journo - but would rather we gave them Hugill than Idah. (n/m) (NCFC) - norwaay, Aug 4, 20:11:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.