I don't see the two are linked
If anything, if we are getting less in sponsorship, we should be trying to get more in transfer fees, not less.
But in terms of sponsorship, I would be very happy for us to accept a less lucrative deal and have a smaller player budget. Probably only very slightly smaller given the sums being talked about. Sponsorship income from this deal is presumably fairly insignificant compared to TV money for example.
Posted By: ede on June 7th 2021 at 22:42:48
Message Thread
- Genuine question: if the club came out and said that it would no longer look (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jun 7, 22:32:39
- Fully expect us to need to sell/borrow to cover any shortfall (NCFC) - CWC, Jun 10, 16:28:47
- Not sure the question is particularly well worded / posed (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 23:32:47
- For accept / accepting, also read proud and full of respect for the club. (n/m) (NCFC) - NxNW, Jun 7, 23:33:32
- I don't see the two are linked (NCFC) - ede, Jun 7, 22:42:48
- 100% (NCFC) - ingi, Jun 7, 22:38:12
- Ding (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 7, 22:33:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.