There was no possibility of the c**t getting injured
So it cannot be serious foul play.
It wasn’t as if it was just by chance that Pearson avoided injury, there was nothing there that endangered him in any way
Posted By: SimonOTBC on April 17th 2021 at 20:58:11
Message Thread
- Unbiased (NCFC) - Kev33, Apr 17, 20:49:12
- I just think in a non scoring position...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 17, 20:52:52
- vmt (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 17, 20:55:37
- It has to be dangerous, doesn’t it? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 17, 20:54:18
- Yes, it certainly has, but you can't officiate with that thinking... (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Apr 17, 20:52:05
- Mate come on. That just isn't a red. (n/m) (NCFC) - stanleh, Apr 17, 20:54:07
- My opinion, based on15 years reffing at senior level 🤷 (n/m) (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Apr 17, 21:00:36
- I can see why he gave it (NCFC) - jAC, Apr 17, 20:55:41
- I thought it was much more dangerous the way the Bournemouth cunt (NCFC) - stanleh, Apr 17, 20:56:41
- There was no possibility of the cunt getting injured (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 17, 20:58:11
- I thought it was much more dangerous the way the Bournemouth cunt (NCFC) - stanleh, Apr 17, 20:56:41
- Mate come on. That just isn't a red. (n/m) (NCFC) - stanleh, Apr 17, 20:54:07
- I could live with that if it was correct (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 17, 20:49:56
- I agree, if clear cut. I thought a yellow OK but never a red. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 17, 20:54:54
- I just think in a non scoring position...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 17, 20:52:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.