Surely that wasn’t because we had Trybull / Tettey though?

I don’t disagree with the statement. You’re right, we didn’t have skipp two years ago. You’re right we were far better offensively.

But in my view if we’d had skipp in for Trybull or tettey that season, we’d have been even better. I think the issue is the person alongside skipp plus the balance of the three behind Pukki; in particular Stieperman was immense that season.

Posted By: SimonOTBC on February 5th 2021 at 22:55:25

Message Thread

I know I will be shot down for this but Skipp needs to be dropped (NCFC) - Canarygunn, Feb 5, 22:39:50
- Just no (n/m) (NCFC) - helvegtheowl, Feb 6, 08:31:14
- He was excellent tonight. Him being subbed was ludicrous (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 5, 23:02:06
  - Agreed (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 23:06:21
    - Rupp or Skipp? (n/m) (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 23:13:04
- I don’t see it as Skipps job to be our quarter back (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 22:50:23
- Skipp and Rupp not physical enough nor creative going forwards (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 5, 22:45:55
- Interesting. Worth a try because Skipp is gone next year (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 5, 22:44:06
  - We didn't have Skipp 2 years ago and we were far better offensively (n/m) (NCFC) - Canarygunn, Feb 5, 22:47:07
    - Surely that wasn’t because we had Trybull / Tettey though? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 22:55:25
- He was good (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 5, 22:43:26
  - But he doesn't influence the game positively (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 22:46:44
- Agreed. Or I'd get Tettey in with McLean. (n/m) (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 22:42:02
- Everyone will say its because Rupp and Placheta went off (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Feb 5, 22:41:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.