Interesting. Worth a try because Skipp is gone next year - Wrath of the Barclay

Interesting. Worth a try because Skipp is gone next year

and that's your midfield two. Bold call with Skipp being as good as he has.

Posted By: SeattleSounders on February 5th 2021 at 22:44:06

Message Thread

I know I will be shot down for this but Skipp needs to be dropped (NCFC) - Canarygunn, Feb 5, 22:39:50
- Just no (n/m) (NCFC) - helvegtheowl, Feb 6, 08:31:14
- He was excellent tonight. Him being subbed was ludicrous (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 5, 23:02:06
  - Agreed (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 23:06:21
    - Rupp or Skipp? (n/m) (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 23:13:04
- I don’t see it as Skipps job to be our quarter back (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 22:50:23
- Skipp and Rupp not physical enough nor creative going forwards (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 5, 22:45:55
- Interesting. Worth a try because Skipp is gone next year (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 5, 22:44:06
  - We didn't have Skipp 2 years ago and we were far better offensively (n/m) (NCFC) - Canarygunn, Feb 5, 22:47:07
    - Surely that wasn’t because we had Trybull / Tettey though? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Feb 5, 22:55:25
- He was good (n/m) (NCFC) - jamesward, Feb 5, 22:43:26
  - But he doesn't influence the game positively (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 22:46:44
- Agreed. Or I'd get Tettey in with McLean. (n/m) (NCFC) - Suilven, Feb 5, 22:42:02
- Everyone will say its because Rupp and Placheta went off (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Feb 5, 22:41:29

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.