I assume it's when Pukki touches it and cantwell is no longer offside

he's definitely onside for the second pass.

As he doesn't interfere in play or block anyone's view etc before pukki gets it, then surely he's ruled onside.

Worthing should settle it for us

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on December 29th 2020 at 22:22:18

Message Thread

if the offside goal was given - then we would have gone on to win it easily (NCFC) - pinkney, Dec 29, 21:45:47
- Disagree (NCFC) - fond, Dec 29, 21:53:39
- I thought the 25-30 mins after HT was some of the best stuff we've played this season (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 21:48:27
  - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Dec 29, 22:00:57
  - yes it was relentless pressure if we had scored then I think QPR would have cracked. (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Dec 29, 21:49:53
    - just showing it now on ifollow, 3-4 really good chances (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 21:52:48
      - Was cantwell onside for the pass to Pukki? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:01:19
        
        hard to tell, but surely once it goes to pukki then it doesn't matter does it? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:03:07
        
        I think it does matter, but i could be wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:10:22
        
        I think only if interfering in the original phase (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:12:12
        
        When does the phase end? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:14:08
        
        I assume it's when Pukki touches it and cantwell is no longer offside (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:22:18
        
        I guess the counter argument would be he gained an advantage from being offside (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:28:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.