if the offside goal was given - then we would have gone on to win it easily

but we could have lost it by the end as well - thin margins

positives lots of them we created chances

earlier subs after goal would have helped but there you go.

1pt from those two games is a bit rubbish but we looked better in terms of passing

Posted By: pinkney on December 29th 2020 at 21:45:47

Message Thread

if the offside goal was given - then we would have gone on to win it easily (NCFC) - pinkney, Dec 29, 21:45:47
- Disagree (NCFC) - fond, Dec 29, 21:53:39
- I thought the 25-30 mins after HT was some of the best stuff we've played this season (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 21:48:27
  - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Chris Peacock, Dec 29, 22:00:57
  - yes it was relentless pressure if we had scored then I think QPR would have cracked. (n/m) (NCFC) - pinkney, Dec 29, 21:49:53
    - just showing it now on ifollow, 3-4 really good chances (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 21:52:48
      - Was cantwell onside for the pass to Pukki? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:01:19
        
        hard to tell, but surely once it goes to pukki then it doesn't matter does it? (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:03:07
        
        I think it does matter, but i could be wrong (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:10:22
        
        I think only if interfering in the original phase (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:12:12
        
        When does the phase end? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:14:08
        
        I assume it's when Pukki touches it and cantwell is no longer offside (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Dec 29, 22:22:18
        
        I guess the counter argument would be he gained an advantage from being offside (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 29, 22:28:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.