Extended spells of complete dominance
In which we are unable to break down the opposition because we only have one means to approach goal - fancy passing in to Pukki.
In games where we clearly have the quality to dominate it might be worth moving from our one and only play style - which can be defeated by parking the bus - to a backup/alternate system which is more complicated for the opposition to defend against.
Ah. It doesn't matter. I trust in Farke. It will be 4231 and rarely anything different. I just have fond memories of Lambo style 442 diamond and was thinking it could be a reasonable alternative in games where we are dominant.
Posted By: Timmy_Goat on December 29th 2020 at 22:17:17
Message Thread
- Is there a case to suggest 442 diamond as an option? (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:49:39
- What in earth have you seen from Hugill and Pukki as a combo to suggest it might work? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 21:55:21
- How many minutes have they played together? (n/m) (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:57:02
- What have you seen that suggests ripping up the entire formation? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:06:39
- Extended spells of complete dominance (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 22:17:17
- I know what you're saying but the extended spells of dominance (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:30:07
- Extended spells of complete dominance (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 22:17:17
- What have you seen that suggests ripping up the entire formation? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:06:39
- How many minutes have they played together? (n/m) (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:57:02
- Cor, Skipp would have to lay down an absolute monumental shift in that formation (NCFC) - Colonel_Mustard, Dec 29, 21:54:12
- Nah (NCFC) - Super_stuie_webber, Dec 29, 21:53:26
- Which 3? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:07:07
- makes sense to me (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 29, 21:52:04
- I was thinking two strikers for two different approaches (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:56:02
- That's what we were doing near the end vs Watford and Hugill was nowhere near (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:07:41
- I was thinking two strikers for two different approaches (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:56:02
- Retro! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 29, 21:49:50
- What in earth have you seen from Hugill and Pukki as a combo to suggest it might work? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 21:55:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.