Is there a case to suggest 442 diamond as an option?

Skipp holding, Cantwell and Vrancic mid, Emi tip. Pukki and Hughill up front. When we are so dominant for long periods of the game is it worth risking the second striker?

Basically swap Hughill for McLean.

Meh. Should have won that...

Posted By: Timmy_Goat on December 29th 2020 at 21:49:39

Message Thread

Is there a case to suggest 442 diamond as an option? (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:49:39
- What in earth have you seen from Hugill and Pukki as a combo to suggest it might work? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 21:55:21
  - How many minutes have they played together? (n/m) (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:57:02
    - What have you seen that suggests ripping up the entire formation? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:06:39
      - Extended spells of complete dominance (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 22:17:17
        
        I know what you're saying but the extended spells of dominance (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:30:07
- Cor, Skipp would have to lay down an absolute monumental shift in that formation (NCFC) - Colonel_Mustard, Dec 29, 21:54:12
- Nah (NCFC) - Super_stuie_webber, Dec 29, 21:53:26
  - Which 3? (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:07:07
- makes sense to me (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 29, 21:52:04
  - I was thinking two strikers for two different approaches (NCFC) - Timmy_Goat, Dec 29, 21:56:02
    - That's what we were doing near the end vs Watford and Hugill was nowhere near (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Dec 29, 22:07:41
- Retro! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Dec 29, 21:49:50

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.