the figures for promoted sides are wildly wrong
The last time Villa were in the PL they spent £93m on wages.
Athletic think £71m is a reasonable guess (last year's £65m plus "10 per cent or so" to allow for the divisional change.
Likewise Norwich.
Last wage bill in PL was £67m, yet Athletic suggest we use a £50m figure.
Posted By: Henclrikus on July 29th 2020 at 09:44:45
Message Thread
- Points per wage bill... (NCFC) - loz, Jul 29, 09:20:42
- More pertinently it suggests that established Prem sides (NCFC) - Cardiff Canary, Jul 29, 10:29:17
- Watford's figure is interesting (NCFC) - WestYorksCanary, Jul 29, 10:16:21
- the figures for promoted sides are wildly wrong (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jul 29, 09:44:45
- Doesn't Villa's also not account for some of their bigger players having been on loan... (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 29, 15:22:19
- Promoted clubs are based on champ season so can’t really compare ... (NCFC) - loz, Jul 29, 10:29:04
- so why did they publish it? archant-levels shoddiness. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jul 29, 10:41:17
- Nathan Ake doesn’t have a relegation clause in his contract (NCFC) - Duck, Jul 29, 09:29:46
- Plenty of takers though he’s off to Man City (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jul 29, 09:35:26
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.