the point
as I'm sure you understand, is not that we wouldn't "wish" to see inaccurate statements removed - or even that most people would be not be able to agree about the inaccuracy of some statements - it's that the boundaries of "disinformation" are so very obviously hard to draw & the scope for disagreement/exploitation of such a power is obvious.
Posted By: paulg on May 7th 2020 at 14:06:17
Message Thread
- Blimey (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 10:24:26
- well I'm firmly in that 55% (General Chat) - CWC, May 7, 13:47:43
- the point (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 14:06:17
- but then all of ^^ and vv applies equally to, eg, promoting religious extremism (General Chat) - CWC, May 7, 15:04:47
- who it protects you from (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 15:57:38
- & furthermore (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 14:08:37
- but then all of ^^ and vv applies equally to, eg, promoting religious extremism (General Chat) - CWC, May 7, 15:04:47
- Hear hear. (n/m) (General Chat) - DrDublin, May 7, 14:00:25
- Maybe he’s surprised it’s as low as 55% (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, May 7, 14:00:06
- Maybe - but maybe not for the reasons you think! (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 14:09:30
- the point (General Chat) - paulg, May 7, 14:06:17
- That first paragraph is just nuts (General Chat) - Tombs, May 7, 11:21:06
- well I'm firmly in that 55% (General Chat) - CWC, May 7, 13:47:43
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.