clearly we are good enough
and clearly we are not consistant enough. genuinely i don't get it.
Posted By: earthleakage on December 9th 2019 at 03:18:22
Message Thread
- clearly we are good enough (NCFC) - earthleakage, Dec 9, 03:18:22
- Yesterday’s result had (n/m) (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Dec 9, 07:16:51
- Nothing to do not being or consistent enough and (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Dec 9, 07:17:51
- I do think it's sometimes ' men against boys' literally. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Dec 9, 07:25:18
- Nothing to do not being or consistent enough and (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Dec 9, 07:17:51
- Defo not good enough (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 9, 06:24:22
- Clearly we’re not (NCFC) - inutero, Dec 9, 03:20:35
- the consistancy is the problem, not the level of skill (n/m) (NCFC) - earthleakage, Dec 9, 04:29:03
- I would say our team is probably more skilful than sheff (NCFC) - Men without hats, Dec 9, 07:56:41
- but that's the very essence of being 'good enough' (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 9, 06:09:57
- the consistancy is the problem, not the level of skill (n/m) (NCFC) - earthleakage, Dec 9, 04:29:03
- Yesterday’s result had (n/m) (NCFC) - Nelsons final flanel, Dec 9, 07:16:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.