Yes, it's normal
The only reason for the "includes Directors" bit is that there is a separate disclosure note just for Directors remuneration (note 8 in our accounts), so some people might otherwise assume that because their remuneration is disclosed there it is not being included in this Related Party Transactions note.
Posted By: mr carra on November 5th 2019 at 15:58:05
Message Thread
- One last gem from the Notes (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 11:50:12
- What do you think Note 28 is? (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 14:44:28
- Emoluments just means salaries, fees and gains earned from employment (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Nov 5, 18:43:55
- I do not know (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 15:31:35
- Pretty sure you're right (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 15:42:31
- Why are they not included with the other staff salaries though? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 15:49:59
- They are, but they also have to be disclosed separately (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 15:54:53
- the website identifies "Key People" (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 15:59:42
- Suspect the accounts version is less fluid if anything (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 16:04:24
- the website identifies "Key People" (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 15:59:42
- They are, but they also have to be disclosed separately (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 15:54:53
- The reference to "including directors" is interesting though. Is that normal? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 15:46:43
- Yes, it's normal (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 15:58:05
- Why are they not included with the other staff salaries though? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 15:49:59
- Pretty sure you're right (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 15:42:31
- Obligation to purchase Amadou ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 5, 11:56:28
- That wouldn't be an expense, though, so it's not a potential liability (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 13:05:29
- Not obligation but probably contingency if we do buy him. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 5, 12:48:26
- Are we obliged to buy him though? Think its an option isn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 12:34:05
- Thought we were obliged if we stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 5, 12:49:23
- So that's a no then (NCFC) - FreshBlood, Nov 5, 14:24:19
- contingent liabilities are supposed to be "likely" events though (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Nov 5, 14:14:35
- Club announcement when we signed him said "an option to buy" (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 5, 13:19:14
- You'd call it "an agreement to buy" (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 13:29:34
- Which means that's not what it is then? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 5, 13:35:33
- You'd call it "an agreement to buy" (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 13:29:34
- Thought we were obliged if we stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 5, 12:49:23
- good shout. So just the 15m bonuses? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 12:24:46
- What do you think Note 28 is? (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 14:44:28
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.