The player wage bill anyway
It also indicates we have over £8m of non-player wages plus well over £10m of other operating expenses, so we're still looking at a pretty chunky loss even without the bonuses. Sustainable sort term given we have saleable assets but there's no guarantee that will always be the case.
The key for a club like us (and tbf has been for basically all of the nearly 50 years I've been going, it isn't anything new) is to try and acquire players who will go up in value, whether youths or bargain purchases, to cover that deficit. That's where your fortunes rise or fall...
Posted By: mr carra on November 5th 2019 at 10:54:56
Message Thread
- accounts are in (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:02:59
- this is interesting... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 5, 09:44:56
- Ben Dack's hair is interesting (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:48:15
- Quite posh too I thought (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:49:34
- Ben Dack's hair is interesting (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:48:15
- Ben Kensell looks like a guilt puppy sitting next to a poo on the club webshite (n/m) (NCFC) - maidstoneyellow, Nov 5, 09:27:02
- What I learnt from the accounts (NCFC) - inutero, Nov 5, 09:15:32
- Who we paid actual money for (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:17:28
- He can't get a sniff of first team action. Must be well off the pace. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 5, 09:27:51
- Who we paid actual money for (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:17:28
- any info on our wage bill before bonuses were applied? (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Nov 5, 09:10:25
- about 11m in player bonuses. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 5, 10:58:46
- 38m loss! (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 5, 09:03:07
- Recall a discussion a while ago about promotion clauses on new players (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Nov 5, 10:09:20
- If we hadn't got promoted we'd be in a right old state (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:08:16
- we'd have made a £10-15m loss without promotion (NCFC) - jAC, Nov 5, 09:09:44
- Yeah bonuses must have been pretty big (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:10:42
- Oh, fair enough (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:10:33
- However imagine another couple of seasons of non promotion. We would run out of (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 5, 09:13:32
- Well the figures provided suggest the wage bill was down to £24.5m on a turnover of £34m (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 10:26:26
- The player wage bill anyway (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 5, 10:54:56
- we're buying up yoofs at a phenomenal rate so might have kept them coming (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Nov 5, 09:23:27
- And back to league one (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:16:41
- Leeds will never go up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:23:39
- They should be 12 points clear at the top (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:26:31
- So if they're not when their xG is so high (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:42:49
- They should be 12 points clear at the top (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:26:31
- Were staying up mate has nobody told you ? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Nov 5, 09:21:47
- To have any hope we need a big turnaround next 5 games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 5, 09:24:48
- Leeds will never go up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 5, 09:23:39
- Well the figures provided suggest the wage bill was down to £24.5m on a turnover of £34m (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 5, 10:26:26
- However imagine another couple of seasons of non promotion. We would run out of (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Nov 5, 09:13:32
- we'd have made a £10-15m loss without promotion (NCFC) - jAC, Nov 5, 09:09:44
- this is interesting... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 5, 09:44:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.