The ironic thing
is that if BJ/Cox had stated the actual purpose of the prorogation, characterising it as a political step required to allow time and space in which to bring about the outcome voted for in the referendum and consequent upon notice under article 50 etc etc ... it would have been far more difficult for the Ct to intervene (tho it might still have done so). But they were fools, and insofar as they said anything, relied upon a reason that was plainly inadequate as a justification, and then put in no real evidence on the point - so the Ct could say that they had not been given any proper basis. Cox is either stupid or dishonest. Or maybe both.
Posted By: paulg on September 25th 2019 at 21:26:58
Message Thread
- The ironic thing (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:26:58
- Can anyone tell me which law has actually been broken? (General Chat) - Darren Eadie, Sep 25, 21:29:49
- unless for a "proper purpose" (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:46:29
- sorry - Major's "uncontradicted" evidence (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:47:08
- Notsomuch law as a point of constitutional principal (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 25, 21:34:29
- Thanks for explaining 👍🏻 (n/m) (General Chat) - Darren Eadie, Sep 25, 21:36:24
- The UK constitution (General Chat) - NorthByNorthWalsham, Sep 25, 21:32:44
- Only the law they invented yesterday. (n/m) (General Chat) - shoddy, Sep 25, 21:32:15
- *re-asserted (n/m) (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 25, 21:36:01
- Sumption described it as "revolutionary" (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:51:51
- well he couldn't possibly have been wrong now, could he! (n/m) (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 25, 22:01:04
- I'd never dare suggest such a thing... (n/m) (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 22:06:14
- well he couldn't possibly have been wrong now, could he! (n/m) (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 25, 22:01:04
- I stand corrected (General Chat) - shoddy, Sep 25, 21:44:16
- Sumption described it as "revolutionary" (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:51:51
- *re-asserted (n/m) (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 25, 21:36:01
- unless for a "proper purpose" (General Chat) - paulg, Sep 25, 21:46:29
- No humility from either disgusting people (n/m) (General Chat) - loz, Sep 25, 21:28:43
- Can anyone tell me which law has actually been broken? (General Chat) - Darren Eadie, Sep 25, 21:29:49
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.