Really? Despite the fact that the article you've just read states the contrary?
Why do you think you know better than the person that wrote that article who (presumably) will have put some research into such?
Posted By: 702 on July 22nd 2019 at 17:58:56
Message Thread
- 3/3 (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Jul 22, 17:34:06
- Q2 is pretty ambiguous (General Chat) - matt in london, Jul 22, 20:52:07
- Simples (General Chat) - Cannydc, Jul 22, 20:44:56
- Pretty straight forward. 3/3 though wasn't convinced I'd got them all until I'd checked. (n/m) (General Chat) - Pixelman, Jul 22, 19:45:33
- Piece of piss (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Jul 22, 18:17:43
- Thats an awful site on mobile (General Chat) - Jester, Jul 22, 17:43:53
- To be honest I don't think anyone (General Chat) - Highlander, Jul 22, 17:41:06
- Sorry, I didn't read the article (General Chat) - Highlander, Jul 22, 18:36:54
- Really? Despite the fact that the article you've just read states the contrary? (General Chat) - 702, Jul 22, 17:58:56
- *aplos if ww2 (n/m) (General Chat) - Chris Peacock, Jul 22, 17:34:22
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.