Oxford incident here
User Posted Link
2 minutes in.
I guess one difference is the keeper is isolated whereas there was a sheff weds defender their too?
Posted By: SimonOTBC on April 20th 2019 at 07:42:26
Message Thread
- Can anyone clarify whether the keeper should have been sent off? (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 20, 07:26:29
- Nah, wasn't denying a goalscoring opportunity (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 20, 07:32:04
- I think Hernandez would have got the ball (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Apr 20, 08:10:12
- Have you not seen the replay? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 09:33:24
- I think Hernandez would have got the ball (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Apr 20, 08:10:12
- I don’t know what the rule is so, no. For what it’s worth I think he (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 20, 07:29:34
- Oxford’s keeper was seemingly sent off in the same cicrucmstances (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 20, 07:30:52
- Completely different circumstances (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 09:31:37
- As I say no idea of the rule but for me a red card should apply if (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 20, 07:32:09
- The offence is simply a normal handball so it's the normal handball rule (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 20, 07:36:44
- Oxford incident here (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 20, 07:42:26
- That is the key difference why it isn’t a red (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 09:31:06
- Yep, not a red (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 20, 09:37:05
- That is the key difference why it isn’t a red (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 20, 09:31:06
- Oxford incident here (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 20, 07:42:26
- The offence is simply a normal handball so it's the normal handball rule (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 20, 07:36:44
- Oxford’s keeper was seemingly sent off in the same cicrucmstances (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 20, 07:30:52
- Nah, wasn't denying a goalscoring opportunity (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 20, 07:32:04
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.