It was not. If that is then football has gone soft. I know these days
Any tackle vaguely like that is greeted with gasps and we won’t get it overturned because it’s not a clear error but that red was very, very harsh and was due to their players causing a fuss as much as anything else.
It’s not the sort of dangerous two footed lunge that deserves a red. If you watch it from the side his feet come through at different times.
Posted By: Jim on April 6th 2019 at 16:15:11
Message Thread
- Looking at this image - not sure an appeal would be wise (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 6, 16:08:56
- Yeah hard to tell if he even made contact. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:11:05
- But then the intent rule would then come in wouldn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 6, 16:16:38
- Don't think he intended it either, was just a shit challenge but I cannot see them (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:20:37
- He actually moved one of his feet to try and follow the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:17:36
- But then the intent rule would then come in wouldn't it? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 6, 16:16:38
- It was not a red card challenge in my view. Their players reaction and the linesman (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:10:44
- I was directly above it (upper barclay) (NCFC) - Charles21, Apr 6, 16:16:14
- 2 challenges very different. It was a red all day long (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Apr 6, 16:14:27
- It was absolutely a red card challenge. Maybe not a red card connection. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:11:40
- It was not. If that is then football has gone soft. I know these days (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:15:11
- SERIOUS FOUL PLAY (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Apr 6, 16:23:04
- if it were the other way around we'd have been braying for a red (NCFC) - Tombs, Apr 6, 16:27:04
- Was not endangering his safety. If you take that literally they (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:25:58
- Jim, you often talk a lot of sense, but you're miles off the mark here.... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 6, 16:30:11
- I dont think any of us could say to the ref that he was flat wrong to think (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Apr 6, 16:32:46
- Anyway it doesn’t matter, we won’t get it overturned as it was a foul and (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:28:24
- Jim, you often talk a lot of sense, but you're miles off the mark here.... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 6, 16:30:11
- SERIOUS FOUL PLAY (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Apr 6, 16:23:04
- It was not. If that is then football has gone soft. I know these days (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 6, 16:15:11
- Yeah hard to tell if he even made contact. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 6, 16:11:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.