Because
‘it seems really harsh and a bit unfair to Kenny to single him out for us not winning even better than we have the last three matches’
Yesterday wasn’t all that different to Millwall except the opposition were far better, set pieces aside
Posted By: SCC 28 on March 9th 2019 at 11:39:01
Message Thread
- Was it just me or was McLean abit crap yesterday (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 9, 09:46:54
- He was OK second half (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 10:55:51
- He did a job but i dont think it's his natural position (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 9, 10:44:22
- Agreed. Remember Vrancic when he first played? McLean reminds me of him - clearly very (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 9, 14:49:01
- Thought he was fine. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 9, 10:20:27
- I thought he was fine. And we won. And Farke sees them a lot more than we do and he's (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:04:16
- Leitner's improved since he last played. He's now world class, and leaving him on the (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 9, 14:46:42
- Unfair on Leitner (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:14:17
- You have to tell Joe Strimmer that. I don't mind who Daniel chooses to play (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:40:27
- It was very much to you (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:44:42
- Sorry - I'm not sure what you mean? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:05:57
- We missed him at Millwall too for a start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:19:17
- Maybe we did. I haven't said we didn't so I'm still not sure why this point was made 'very (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:31:55
- Only (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:32:58
- because you said I needed to make it to someone else (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:33:25
- Why me at all though - was my point (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:34:23
- Because (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:39:01
- I'm sorry SCC, I'm not trying to be dense. I can't connect the two statements. You must (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:45:43
- Fair enough (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:50:07
- I'm sorry SCC, I'm not trying to be dense. I can't connect the two statements. You must (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:45:43
- Because (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:39:01
- Why me at all though - was my point (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:34:23
- because you said I needed to make it to someone else (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:33:25
- Only (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:32:58
- Maybe we did. I haven't said we didn't so I'm still not sure why this point was made 'very (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:31:55
- Don't think he's being scapegoated (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:15:50
- Hes definitely being picked out more than anyone else (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:33:36
- Because we've got Leitner and Vrancic on the bench (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:39:45
- Yep Vrancic player of the month recently (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:44:12
- Because we've got Leitner and Vrancic on the bench (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:39:45
- Yep some people would prefer our better players starting (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:21:40
- Hes definitely being picked out more than anyone else (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:33:36
- We missed him at Millwall too for a start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:19:17
- Sorry - I'm not sure what you mean? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:05:57
- It was very much to you (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:44:42
- You have to tell Joe Strimmer that. I don't mind who Daniel chooses to play (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:40:27
- He was ok (NCFC) - matgore, Mar 9, 09:50:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.