He was ok
But doesn’t provide what leitner or vrancic do.
I think his best position is competing with stieperman further forward
Understand why farke kept him in but it nearly cost us
Posted By: matgore on March 9th 2019 at 09:50:17
Message Thread
- Was it just me or was McLean abit crap yesterday (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Mar 9, 09:46:54
- He was OK second half (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 10:55:51
- He did a job but i dont think it's his natural position (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Mar 9, 10:44:22
- Agreed. Remember Vrancic when he first played? McLean reminds me of him - clearly very (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 9, 14:49:01
- Thought he was fine. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 9, 10:20:27
- I thought he was fine. And we won. And Farke sees them a lot more than we do and he's (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:04:16
- Leitner's improved since he last played. He's now world class, and leaving him on the (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Mar 9, 14:46:42
- Unfair on Leitner (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:14:17
- You have to tell Joe Strimmer that. I don't mind who Daniel chooses to play (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:40:27
- It was very much to you (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:44:42
- Sorry - I'm not sure what you mean? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:05:57
- We missed him at Millwall too for a start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:19:17
- Maybe we did. I haven't said we didn't so I'm still not sure why this point was made 'very (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:31:55
- Only (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:32:58
- because you said I needed to make it to someone else (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:33:25
- Why me at all though - was my point (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:34:23
- Because (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:39:01
- I'm sorry SCC, I'm not trying to be dense. I can't connect the two statements. You must (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:45:43
- Fair enough (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:50:07
- I'm sorry SCC, I'm not trying to be dense. I can't connect the two statements. You must (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:45:43
- Because (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:39:01
- Why me at all though - was my point (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:34:23
- because you said I needed to make it to someone else (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:33:25
- Only (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:32:58
- Maybe we did. I haven't said we didn't so I'm still not sure why this point was made 'very (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:31:55
- Don't think he's being scapegoated (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:15:50
- Hes definitely being picked out more than anyone else (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:33:36
- Because we've got Leitner and Vrancic on the bench (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:39:45
- Yep Vrancic player of the month recently (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:44:12
- Because we've got Leitner and Vrancic on the bench (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 9, 11:39:45
- Yep some people would prefer our better players starting (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:21:40
- Hes definitely being picked out more than anyone else (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:33:36
- We missed him at Millwall too for a start (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 11:19:17
- Sorry - I'm not sure what you mean? (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 11:05:57
- It was very much to you (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 9, 10:44:42
- You have to tell Joe Strimmer that. I don't mind who Daniel chooses to play (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 9, 10:40:27
- He was ok (NCFC) - matgore, Mar 9, 09:50:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.