Shocking.... A team would be unethical...
Seriously. He is right. They have done nothing illegal.
He is getting a tactical edge.
Why not.
If the EFL is upset they need to make a specific rule banning it.
The punishment cannot be retroactive.
Posted By: usacanary on January 16th 2019 at 19:05:16
Message Thread
- Cheating twats should get punished for bringing game into disrepute (n/m) (Other Football) - um_gah, Jan 16, 17:49:36
- Shocking.... A team would be unethical... (Other Football) - usacanary, Jan 16, 19:05:16
- It will be a fine if anything.. The League don’t have the guts to deduct points (n/m) (Other Football) - colincanary, Jan 16, 19:01:02
- They hardly deduct points for ffp failings (Other Football) - CauldRon, Jan 16, 19:04:53
- Somehow i think if it wasnt a promotion rival (Other Football) - CauldRon, Jan 16, 17:52:07
- I don't give a shit (Other Football) - matt in london, Jan 16, 18:23:15
- Not a million miles from what I assume every club does (Other Football) - Old Man, Jan 16, 18:26:55
- Yes fairly clear it’s the spying which is the issue (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:29:55
- get the bloke into government. These are levels of preparation unheard in Downing st (n/m) (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 16, 18:47:46
- Yes fairly clear it’s the spying which is the issue (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:29:55
- Not a million miles from what I assume every club does (Other Football) - Old Man, Jan 16, 18:26:55
- It was everyone (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 17:53:32
- I think that might be his strategy. Confuse and lengthen the issue by dragging in the (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 18:01:57
- Surely its bringing the game into disrepute though at the very least? (Other Football) - Jim, Jan 16, 18:06:18
- I dont think it meets any of those definitions (n/m) (Other Football) - jAC, Jan 16, 18:56:44
- it's clever rather than improper, why wouldn't you do that? (Other Football) - Tombs, Jan 16, 18:09:48
- Me and tombs totally agree... (Other Football) - usacanary, Jan 16, 19:58:24
- The EFL had said his previous admission was against the agreed charter (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:05:41
- I’d say it’s still against the agreed charter (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 18:12:29
- 23 times greater punishment will do (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:15:05
- I’d say it’s still against the agreed charter (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 18:12:29
- Surely its bringing the game into disrepute though at the very least? (Other Football) - Jim, Jan 16, 18:06:18
- I meant doing it (n/m) (Other Football) - CauldRon, Jan 16, 17:57:50
- Agree but the punishment shouldn’t be affected (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:00:25
- Cant say I gave a shit about that either (n/m) (Other Football) - CB41, Jan 16, 19:35:31
- Agree but the punishment shouldn’t be affected (Other Football) - SCC 28, Jan 16, 18:00:25
- I think that might be his strategy. Confuse and lengthen the issue by dragging in the (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jan 16, 18:01:57
- I don't give a shit (Other Football) - matt in london, Jan 16, 18:23:15
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.