I know what your point was.
We also had eight shots blocked. Just because those weren’t saved by the goalkeeper and because the off target shots were off target doesn’t mean they weren’t chances. Yes we should have made more of them. That’s obvious. But the fact we had them and Stoke didn’t, would lead me to assume our performance was better than theirs and the result didn’t reflect that. And just as obviously, I am aware that performance does not guarantee result.
I just can’t be doing with the whole “not deserving to win” thing. We should give the team credit where it’s due.
Posted By: APB on October 6th 2018 at 20:47:24
Message Thread
- Encouraging performance. Bad result. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 19:37:30
- “We certainly didn’t deserve to win” (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:08:54
- 3 shots on target. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:19:22
- And? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:20:34
- My point was... (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:26:31
- I know what your point was. (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:47:24
- You seem to be looking for an argument in an empty room. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:52:05
- Ok, whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:57:14
- He's a Pollock . (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 6, 23:57:57
- Ok, whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:57:14
- You seem to be looking for an argument in an empty room. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:52:05
- I know what your point was. (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:47:24
- My point was... (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:26:31
- And? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:20:34
- 3 shots on target. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:19:22
- “We certainly didn’t deserve to win” (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:08:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.