My point was...
We lacked a cutting edge. It was an encouraging performance, but despite that, we didn’t really deserve to win. Over 60% possession but only 3 shots on target would seem to support that view.
Posted By: avenging canary on October 6th 2018 at 20:26:31
Message Thread
- Encouraging performance. Bad result. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 19:37:30
- “We certainly didn’t deserve to win” (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:08:54
- 3 shots on target. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:19:22
- And? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:20:34
- My point was... (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:26:31
- I know what your point was. (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:47:24
- You seem to be looking for an argument in an empty room. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:52:05
- Ok, whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:57:14
- He's a Pollock . (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Oct 6, 23:57:57
- Ok, whatever. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:57:14
- You seem to be looking for an argument in an empty room. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:52:05
- I know what your point was. (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:47:24
- My point was... (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:26:31
- And? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:20:34
- 3 shots on target. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Oct 6, 20:19:22
- “We certainly didn’t deserve to win” (NCFC) - APB, Oct 6, 20:08:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.