No, let him take his seat then do the investigation. Innocent till proven guilty
The only reason Democrats are delaying is to try to wrestle control of Supreme Court.
The democrats had ample opportunity to start an investigation but chose to delay for political gain nothing to do with the verification of the truth.
Posted By: John in Texas on September 28th 2018 at 19:52:00
Message Thread
- Which wrathers still have detailed calendars from 1982?? (n/m) (General Chat) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 28, 17:35:58
- Matthew Gibson (n/m) (General Chat) - Graham Nine, Sep 28, 21:21:39
- Tony the Tiger Secret Diary 1984 here pal (n/m) (General Chat) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 28, 19:48:52
- Hello! (n/m) (General Chat) - Bravo win or die, Sep 28, 18:04:03
- That does seem a little strange. What 17 year old boy even has a calendar let alone (General Chat) - Jim, Sep 28, 17:47:14
- Someone who is planning to be a crooked lawyer (General Chat) - Dunney, Sep 28, 17:55:38
- They do day some rapists like to... (General Chat) - usacanary, Sep 28, 17:40:46
- ROFL. (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 17:53:52
- Yep in his opinion he won’t take a polygraph (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 17:57:15
- Do you know what the FBI does and how accurate polygraphs are? (n/m) (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 17:59:31
- Yeah (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 28, 18:19:03
- They work for the Clinton’s? (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 18:04:24
- Nope not a republican nor a democrat. Can't stand either of them (n/m) (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 18:09:23
- ^^^ survivalist (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Sep 28, 18:45:37
- Sovereign Citizen (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Sep 28, 19:23:46
- And this nominee should just be confirmed? (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 18:16:23
- No, let him take his seat then do the investigation. Innocent till proven guilty (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 19:52:00
- his performance was shocking though (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 28, 20:17:48
- It’s not a court case ffs (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 20:05:49
- An accusation is not sufficient proof to disbar somebody. There has to be evidence (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 20:17:19
- She wrote to the Washington Post about it (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 20:43:55
- No, it was leaked against her wishes, she wanted anonimity (n/m) (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 21:36:49
- She wrote to the Washington Post about it (n/m) (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 20:43:55
- An accusation is not sufficient proof to disbar somebody. There has to be evidence (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 20:17:19
- No, let him take his seat then do the investigation. Innocent till proven guilty (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 19:52:00
- ^^^ survivalist (n/m) (General Chat) - APB, Sep 28, 18:45:37
- Nope not a republican nor a democrat. Can't stand either of them (n/m) (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 18:09:23
- Do you know what the FBI does and how accurate polygraphs are? (n/m) (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 17:59:31
- Yep in his opinion he won’t take a polygraph (General Chat) - SCC 28, Sep 28, 17:57:15
- ROFL. (General Chat) - John in Texas, Sep 28, 17:53:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.