I really want us to take a stand on this
It would be great reputationally for the club and might actually do some good as well.
Either crowdfund as suggested, with or without an extra fiver on the replica shirt price to boost things along, or tie it in with a local charideemate (so give some local Good Causes that space on the shirt for a few games or whatever). Or even just sell it for £750k to a normal company or something. I'm sure there are more creative/better ways to take it forward as well; the key thing is to get the club to think in these terms.
Shame the next AGM is still quite a way away; if nothing's happened by then I am very tempted to put in an appearance (as I am a shareholder so entitled to ask questions). I reckon it's the kind of thing Balls might actually get behind personally.
Posted By: Old Man on April 20th 2018 at 19:43:48
Message Thread
- Really hope next seasons shirt doesn't have a betting company on (NCFC) - ingi, Apr 20, 18:17:17
- 3 years (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 20, 22:09:09
- I really want us to take a stand on this (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 20, 19:43:48
- I concur with all of this (n/m) (NCFC) - Knitted Jesus, Apr 20, 23:10:41
- Tied in for another 2 years though aren't we (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 20, 22:10:51
- Agreed OM. Gets my vote as a shareholder (n/m) (NCFC) - Worthing Yellow, Apr 20, 20:51:56
- Great shout (NCFC) - ingi, Apr 20, 20:51:31
- Agreed, I think it's worth it for the positive response we'd get (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:50:56
- I'm more concerned with getting the betting companies off than completely sponsor-free (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 20, 20:00:59
- i bet we have (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Apr 20, 19:30:21
- I’m (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 20, 18:22:49
- I’m pretty sure we do but at least it’s not as tacky as the Ipswich one next year (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 20, 18:23:22
- not as tack as an even tackier one, but still tacky as fuck (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:05:18
- That would be excellent and would probably get us more publicity than Stephen Fry tweets (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:22:12
- yeah, totally. I was thinking about mailing the club to suggest it (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:24:35
- It would be in (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:25:01
- teresting to know what it would cost (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:25:39
- shirt sponsorship income was estiamted at 1mn quid when we were in the prem (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:28:32
- That’s well cheap, USAC could find that in his loose change (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:35:38
- shirt sponsorship income was estiamted at 1mn quid when we were in the prem (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:28:32
- teresting to know what it would cost (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:25:39
- It would be in (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:25:01
- yeah, totally. I was thinking about mailing the club to suggest it (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:24:35
- I’d gladly ban all betting companies from sport altogether. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 20, 19:14:26
- That would be excellent and would probably get us more publicity than Stephen Fry tweets (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Apr 20, 19:22:12
- not as tack as an even tackier one, but still tacky as fuck (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 20, 19:05:18
- I’m pretty sure we do but at least it’s not as tacky as the Ipswich one next year (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 20, 18:23:22
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.