I’m not sure
Part of the reason for ‘I told you so’ repetition is because we *have* seen this so many times. And that’s at the performance on the pitch - of course, every team bar an elite few have good times, bad times - and off the pitch, which is where I think most of the annoyance is really centred.
Because we did have a plan that allowed for promotion and relegation but then seemed to cast it to one side, turn it into blow money to stay up, oh there’s no money, oh what next.
And that is where my frustration comes from - it’s not wisdom in hindsight; every longstanding fan was wondering why we seemed to be going back down the same route that had caused problems before. Not a miserable I told you so, but genuine concern that bad decision-making and some pretty strong stubbornness from the board - have we already forgotten Delia’s Times interview - just don’t show the ambition required. Yes we changed the structure - but after some fairly disastrous errors which we really should have been wiser about.
And sorry but regardless of the great investment opportunity, the bond issue is the firm evidence that we’ve reached the same point when the normal pots are empty and it’s back to the packaging it as a nice community club gesture.
And that is why the trite ‘you wanted investment, now you’re complaining’ comments to the bond critics are unfair - the fans have always been a major donor - whether it was the Grant Holt rebate or the shares issues to support promotion.
But it’s only a game.
Posted By: camcan on March 11th 2018 at 09:39:32
Message Thread
- Best post yesterday was from APB, who said (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 11, 08:15:21
- Don't agree at all (NCFC) - earlydoors, Mar 11, 10:49:52
- I don’t think people gloat when we lose, certainly not genuine posters anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 11:14:10
- I think both sides gloat, but neither side thinks they do. (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Mar 11, 11:22:02
- I don’t think people gloat when we lose, certainly not genuine posters anyway (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 11:14:10
- Totally agree (NCFC) - trt354, Mar 11, 10:24:11
- In the interest of balance.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 10:37:37
- That's true (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:42:16
- I honestly haven't noticed that on here but I don't do Twitter so perhaps that's fair. (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Mar 11, 11:09:05
- I agree, it can be quite depressing and triggering at times (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:43:08
- Maybe, however... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 11:11:35
- I think there is a third type of poster who hasa been largely forgotten in this debate (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Mar 11, 11:07:24
- Good post mate. agree with you and you and I both (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 11:16:53
- And for the most part, those are not the sort of people who post on here (NCFC) - Chalk Hill Bitter, Mar 11, 11:22:03
- Very true, good post. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 11:09:31
- Good post mate. agree with you and you and I both (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 11:16:53
- In the interest of balance.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 10:37:37
- People are passionate .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Mar 11, 09:57:21
- That’s why I said there’s nothing wrong with criticism. (NCFC) - APB, Mar 11, 10:13:03
- Of course you care ... everyone on here cares .. that’s the point of the board (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Mar 11, 10:24:13
- I think our style of play is more suited to the prem... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 10:34:48
- I agree. It was such a shame to lose Pritchard just after he'd start to play and score/ (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:49:38
- Our performances against Arsenal, Chelsea, Wolves, Boro etc would tend to support that (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 10:39:50
- Yup.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 10:44:49
- I think our style of play is more suited to the prem... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 10:34:48
- Of course you care ... everyone on here cares .. that’s the point of the board (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Mar 11, 10:24:13
- That’s why I said there’s nothing wrong with criticism. (NCFC) - APB, Mar 11, 10:13:03
- I’m not sure (NCFC) - camcan, Mar 11, 09:39:32
- The plan worked really well but we were not relegated first season up (NCFC) - watfordcanary, Mar 11, 14:11:10
- spot on, I went yesty and it was like being back at villa away . (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 11, 10:40:35
- But it's one game and Farke has got the defence (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 11, 11:32:43
- I just found yesterday so frustrating. (NCFC) - Men without hats, Mar 11, 15:40:21
- A lot of people tend to do that though to be fair (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:45:53
- But it's one game and Farke has got the defence (NCFC) - Chopper, Mar 11, 11:32:43
- That’s how I see it ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Mar 11, 09:57:57
- Great post 👍 (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 09:49:55
- Maybe it's a bit of denial too. Not wanting to realise that things aren't as good as we'd (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:47:17
- Its all down to individuals expectations and ambitions for the club (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 11, 09:35:28
- It's a real shame we will lose Gunn and Madderz. We need way more Zimbo's going forward! (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Mar 11, 11:53:22
- Like. Both posts. Like. (NCFC) - BigGrantHolt, Mar 11, 09:28:34
- I did have plenty of beer. It was good. (NCFC) - APB, Mar 11, 09:21:36
- Spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Mar 11, 09:00:44
- I think Farke is being given a break to be honest (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 08:29:03
- yes but ref owbership (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 11, 09:21:52
- That is true but then if the team struggles because of those decisions then (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 11, 09:45:25
- yes but ref owbership (NCFC) - CWC, Mar 11, 09:21:52
- Don't agree at all (NCFC) - earlydoors, Mar 11, 10:49:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.