This McLean deal

I can't see it as anything other than good business. We don't need him now; assuming we don't go up we will next term, and if we do we can always loan him out.

No it's not the striker we all want but I don't think it's much of a stretch to think that they are capable of focusing on more than one deal at a time.

I should probably resign from the Wrath or at least flounce but f**k it.

Posted By: Old Man on January 22nd 2018 at 18:25:07

Message Thread

This McLean deal (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 22, 18:25:07
- To my eye it's a binary event with the question answered (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 22, 19:05:12
  - no, it's not binary because the signings they've already made have been patchy (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 22, 19:17:37
    - A followup thought. I don't think the club can afford to (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 22, 19:42:19
      - have "patchy" transfer" results. We are already on the (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 22, 19:45:25
        
        there's no team in the world that doesn't have "patchy" transfers (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 22, 20:43:32
    - Binary to me from the financial aspect. If he's good it's (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 22, 19:24:26
    - If you read Dave Kitson/TSF on transfers you get an idea of some of what goes on (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 22, 19:21:46
      - TSF claimed in 2016 we would have to sell all our players due.... (NCFC) - usacanary, Jan 22, 21:03:45
      - indeed (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 22, 20:42:52
- Yebbutnobut (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 22, 18:53:30
- Seems the right idea to me too but such is Wrath flouncing (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 22, 18:28:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.