If the base case is we have to pay all his wages

Surely not paying all of his wages is better?

Presumably if there was an option for us to pay none of his wages, or sell him, we would.

So if this is the best offer on the table, that’s a good move.

I suppose the alternative scenario would be someone that thinks the base case is he plays for us - but I don’t think that’s a reality

Posted By: SimonOTBC on January 18th 2018 at 14:17:46

Message Thread

Naismith at hearts... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 18, 13:50:02
- pointless, poor deal for us (n/m) (NCFC) - wolfio, Jan 18, 13:58:35
  - What is the deal? (n/m) (NCFC) - Dunney, Jan 18, 14:01:01
    - 50% saving of wages for a complete shithouse sounds ok to me? (n/m) (NCFC) - Waz, Jan 18, 14:04:57
    - They are paying a quarter of his wages ... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 18, 14:04:22
      - Guessing he will have appearance bonuses, etc which is why he's not being included. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 18, 14:20:55
        
        Or Farke believes he’s a great big pile of wank... (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 18, 14:25:31
        
        He does appear to be a gret ol pile of wank to be fair. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 14:44:07
        
        tbf to his judgement he seemingly never wanted to come here... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 14:46:20
      - If the base case is we have to pay all his wages (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 18, 14:17:46
      - So we save up to around £0.2 million. Not pointless. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 18, 14:06:26
        
        anything that removes him from norfolk is a pretty good deal (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Jan 18, 14:20:45
        
        Agee. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Jan 18, 14:48:00
    - Hearts are paying 25% of his wages. (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 18, 14:03:30

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.