Clint Easton v Andy Hughes

Easton annoyed me..........because technically he was top draw...I spoke to couple players at the time about him and they both said he was at the time one of the most naturally gifted players we had (and we won the league that year)! BUT he just didn't put the effort in and didn't seen to give a damn.
Now Hughes he gives it everything but is technically no better than a League 1 player at best. So its Worthy's fault not his.
Combine the two and we'd have a decent player (well combine the best bits).

Posted By: BINMEN8R on February 17th 2006 at 09:34:06

Message Thread

Clint Easton v Andy Hughes (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 17, 09:34:06
- In that combination though, if the talend and workrate genes were both in the recessive .. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Feb 17, 09:37:00

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.