And it's cost us in terms of energy expenditure. Most of the deficit was in the 2nd half

I'm guessing. It would be great if we could move on to defending a lead without dropping back and ceding control of the midfield. In the long term it may cost us, but short term, it's great to see them playing it like a cup final.

Posted By: Higher Wrather on September 16th 2017 at 17:23:49

Message Thread

So much for the possession game blades had 68% according to BBC site (NCFC) - ihateipswich, Sep 16, 17:14:17
- And it's cost us in terms of energy expenditure. Most of the deficit was in the 2nd half (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Sep 16, 17:23:49
- thank farke he's ditched that idea at last (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 16, 17:16:19
- Exactly possession means absolutely nothing (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Sep 16, 17:15:41
  - It's not just for its own sake though, is it? (NCFC) - APB, Sep 16, 17:23:10
    - i think it has made us a better team on the ball which can only be a good thing... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 16, 17:25:12

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.