this is an interesting debate

and i don't agree with your assessment of us in the premiership- i certainly don't believe our tactics were to 'lump it up to a big man' . if anything, i think we tried to play pretty passing football too much, when the players we had in key positions were just not up to the job at that level. combine that with the manager's reluctance to drop said underperformers and we became a soft touch. the same goes for the year we went up- 'lump it up to a very fast man', maybe, but not to a big man.
i know neil adams gets a bad press on here for whatever reason, but he reckons that the best way for us to play is to mix it a bit, ie pass it through midfield sometimes, and play the long ball others.
it remains true that most goals, at whatever level, are scored from the more direct ('lump it') approach

as for sunderland- haven't seen them play a full 90 mins, so couldn't comment.
however, if i had to make a guess as to why they have done so poorly while wh and wigan are in the top 1/2, i would say it's down to one thing- m o n e y

Posted By: johnmcdowellshair on February 14th 2006 at 09:27:50


Message Thread


Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.

Log in