Difference is

Both Wigan and West Ham had a decent core of talent in place. They then went out and spent money on quality additions. Sunderland had to rebuild last season and are still massively in debt with a lot of players lacking in quality

Posted By: inutero on February 14th 2006 at 08:43:31

Message Thread

Jezz. West Ham now 6th, Wigan 8th. (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 08:41:22
- this is an interesting debate (Other Football) - johnmcdowellshair, Feb 14, 09:27:50
  - Sunderland and Wham spent the same money over the summer... (Other Football) - Brom, Feb 14, 09:36:45
    - sorry (Other Football) - johnmcdowellshair, Feb 14, 12:57:39
- Difference is (Other Football) - inutero, Feb 14, 08:43:31
  - I think you're right about the core of players (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 08:46:00
    - Not quite true... (Other Football) - Dr Baker, Feb 14, 09:09:29
    - But look at the type of strikers West Ham have (Other Football) - The Secret Handshake, Feb 14, 08:49:06
      - so how come they finished so far behind Sunderland last season? (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 08:51:05
        
        this is going to sound corny but... (Other Football) - mr carra, Feb 14, 09:05:10
        
        yep, that's pretty much where I come out, too. (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 14, 09:07:13
- C'mon then... (Other Football) - Fierce Panda, Feb 14, 08:42:57
  - No (n/m) (Other Football) - The Secret Handshake, Feb 14, 08:49:15

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.