Norwich haven't really got any proper full-backs who are solid at defending

Martin was a good full-back... years ago. Pinto is quick but doesn't offer much else. Husband seems a bit slow but it's early days for him.

The lack of good options in those positions is staggering.

Posted By: Larry Hagman on August 7th 2017 at 14:41:11

Message Thread

Why do Norwich seem to struggle to sign full-backs who can tackle? (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 7, 13:15:37
- it's become less important (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 7, 13:20:37
  - Agree about attacking fullbacks, but the onus is on defending throughout the side. You nee (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Aug 7, 13:44:48
  - When you have a lot of creative players and only 1 striker....... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 7, 13:39:22
    - I think there is a difference between the role in a 5 at the back than a 4 (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 7, 13:56:07
      - well surely in a 5 you're a WB while in a 4 you're a FB? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Aug 7, 14:16:22
        
        Thanks for clearing that up 🙄 (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Aug 7, 16:09:37
        
        Norwich haven't really got any proper full-backs who are solid at defending (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 7, 14:41:11
        
        there aren't many to go around (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 7, 14:45:31
    - Excellent post Larry (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 7, 13:51:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.