lightweight, lost the ball, lack of passing ideas,slow closing down but TBF it was only

a friendly and the pitch wasn't great. He also had a lack of help.

Vranic was further forwards than I expected, where he did OK. He seemed almost a No 10 but a bit off to the left.

Posted By: Larry Hagman on July 20th 2017 at 12:26:45

Message Thread

I thought Reed and full-backs played v.badly yesterday. The new (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jul 20, 11:39:08
- What did the full backs do wrong? Were we three at the back? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jul 20, 13:27:18
- You thought Reed played very badly (Tettey's position). Pray tell why, Larrald (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 20, 11:40:25
  - lightweight, lost the ball, lack of passing ideas,slow closing down but TBF it was only (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jul 20, 12:26:45
    - "Lightweight" klaxon. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jul 20, 13:06:15
  - Thought reed and vrancic looked a good partnership (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jul 20, 11:49:51
    - big hole in midfield because Reed was deep and Vranic was quite far forwards (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jul 20, 12:03:57
      - Reed > tettey either way (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jul 20, 12:08:36
        
        Tettey nearly gave 2 goals away with his first 2 touches. (NCFC) - dennis moore, Jul 20, 13:23:52
        
        Not on that performance (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jul 20, 12:41:50
        
        Can we not sell him back? He sounds well gash. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Jul 20, 13:09:31
        
        Innit bruv. Get rid, soon as. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Jul 20, 13:19:55

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.