Yup...
So would have though the enquiry will be from top down - firstly was the re-furb complying with regs? What was the standard of the winning tender, then a review of the regs to see what would have helped prevent such damage/loss of life....
Defo needs a full review...
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on June 16th 2017 at 10:19:29
Message Thread
- £5,000 (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 16, 00:13:44
- Times has an interesting article on this (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 16, 00:26:45
- Guardian has a good one too: (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 16, 00:34:50
- is it simply (General Chat) - earthleakage, Jun 16, 00:58:09
- But theres still building regs to meet surely? (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jun 16, 09:47:35
- yes there is, there was also a promised updating of the regulations (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 16, 09:59:08
- Yup... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jun 16, 10:19:29
- an *overdue* review of the regs - with a review into why the review of the regs was delaye (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 16, 10:33:41
- Yup... (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jun 16, 10:19:29
- yes there is, there was also a promised updating of the regulations (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Jun 16, 09:59:08
- But theres still building regs to meet surely? (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jun 16, 09:47:35
- is it simply (General Chat) - earthleakage, Jun 16, 00:58:09
- Guardian has a good one too: (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 16, 00:34:50
- Times has an interesting article on this (General Chat) - CWC, Jun 16, 00:26:45
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.