he doesn't like huckerby or mcveigh

he sees them as easy scapegoats because they don;t put the work in and are inconsistent. Ironically, they are the two players that have ensured he has had a job for the last three years.

Posted By: Komodo on February 5th 2006 at 21:36:22

Message Thread

Delia (NCFC) - LoyalSupporter, Feb 5, 21:27:24
- hucsk hasn't been good recently. and didn't do anything today either. (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Feb 5, 21:31:42
  - Fair point, but it's a local derby. The manager shouldn't have to fire them up for that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:32:19
    - I agree, Hucks hasn't been himself recently. This was a weird game to drop him for though! (n/m) (NCFC) - bjt, Feb 5, 21:36:42
      - worthy dropped him because he did the same at portman road (NCFC) - Komodo, Feb 5, 21:39:02
      - To be honest, I bet NW thought "It worked for the game at their place, so...." (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:38:17
        
        could be (NCFC) - Exile, Feb 5, 21:39:21
- Hughes went off because one of his toblerone boots broke. (NCFC) - snowman, Feb 5, 21:30:01
- Hucks was dropped because he's been shite recently. (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:29:49
  - so why did worthy single out hucks to be dropped??? cos the rest of the shitters where (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 5, 21:32:00
    - he doesn't like huckerby or mcveigh (NCFC) - Komodo, Feb 5, 21:36:22
    - Because he's better. And has therefore dropped farther to be at that standard. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:34:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.