Hucks was dropped because he's been s**te recently.

Etuhu was subbed because him and Safri were sitting almost on top of the back four, and giving the Ipswich midfield all the time in the world. But you're not allwoed to take Safri off.

Hughes was, well, Hughes, albeit better than Safri was 2nd half. Huckerby *should* have been more of a threat, but wasn't.

Posted By: Arganth on February 5th 2006 at 21:29:49

Message Thread

Delia (NCFC) - LoyalSupporter, Feb 5, 21:27:24
- hucsk hasn't been good recently. and didn't do anything today either. (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Feb 5, 21:31:42
  - Fair point, but it's a local derby. The manager shouldn't have to fire them up for that. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:32:19
    - I agree, Hucks hasn't been himself recently. This was a weird game to drop him for though! (n/m) (NCFC) - bjt, Feb 5, 21:36:42
      - worthy dropped him because he did the same at portman road (NCFC) - Komodo, Feb 5, 21:39:02
      - To be honest, I bet NW thought "It worked for the game at their place, so...." (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:38:17
        
        could be (NCFC) - Exile, Feb 5, 21:39:21
- Hughes went off because one of his toblerone boots broke. (NCFC) - snowman, Feb 5, 21:30:01
- Hucks was dropped because he's been shite recently. (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:29:49
  - so why did worthy single out hucks to be dropped??? cos the rest of the shitters where (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 5, 21:32:00
    - he doesn't like huckerby or mcveigh (NCFC) - Komodo, Feb 5, 21:36:22
    - Because he's better. And has therefore dropped farther to be at that standard. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arganth, Feb 5, 21:34:16

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.