all because Wes didn't run back for a non-crucial 3rd goal by Reading - Wrath of the Barclay

all because Wes didn't run back for a non-crucial 3rd goal by Reading

will you remind us every time wes is mentioned please. I've only seen you say it about 10 times already. Far too few

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on January 1st 2017 at 16:03:52

Message Thread

Team for Derby (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 15:43:30
- Wes for Pilchard, Murphy for Olsson (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 1, 15:50:58
  - Sorry. Can't count on Wes to give max effort. Plus Pritchard (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 15:54:25
    - howson can play tomorrow (NCFC) - pab, Jan 1, 16:22:25
      - Oh that is awesome. Howson for Tettey then. Tettey can (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 16:26:53
    - We need Wes back so bad it's painful (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 1, 16:08:01
    - all because Wes didn't run back for a non-crucial 3rd goal by Reading (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 1, 16:03:52
      - Well guess what? Here's number 11. No Wes. Fuck him (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 16:14:15
        
        charming. (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 1, 17:27:56
        
        Douche comment by you. Douche response by me. (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 18:14:29
        
        why not top off your slagging of one of everyone's favourite players (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 1, 20:19:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.