Food for thought and No Wes No Win based on those stats
We're not as good a passing side without Wes he links our play together we needed that against Brentford.
Posted By: roedtonowhere on January 1st 2017 at 03:48:38
Message Thread
- Points gained with/without Wes . . . (NCFC) - canary_wharf, Jan 1, 03:24:10
- Top stats. Post of 2017 so far I'd say! (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Jan 1, 10:10:41
- Consistent with the three season analysis I did a while ago (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 07:27:42
- Meaningless if you don't define the quality of the opponent (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Jan 1, 05:36:14
- We've only beaten shit teams we haven't beaten anybody in the top half so there you are (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 1, 08:51:10
- Food for thought and No Wes No Win based on those stats (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Jan 1, 03:48:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.