I read Pixels post as a dig at all negative posters

not just Jim.

The trouble with Jim now is that he has almost become the boards comedy act, I don't think anyone is actually having a "Go" at him personally, more having a go at the virual Jim.

The only way to rectify this really is for Jim to change his username and blend back into the crowd

Posted By: strap_on sally on September 29th 2016 at 12:26:22

Message Thread

-125 and counting (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 29, 10:35:06
- Why are Jim-haters focusing only on Jim? (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 29, 10:50:19
  - maybe there's nothing that particularly sticks in the mind about the other negative poster (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Sep 29, 11:45:21
  - must be a bit thick here but how on earth does that relate to jim? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Sep 29, 10:53:08
    - It's the "game" of giving Jim a minus point every time he does a negative post (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 29, 11:02:37
      - I read Pixels post as a dig at all negative posters (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Sep 29, 12:26:22
        
        not really a dig, more an observation. We all naturally feel a little deflated after (NCFC) - Pixelman, Sep 29, 13:52:33
- For a positive person, it's just relentless (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Sep 29, 10:44:23
- counting backwards? (NCFC) - pants, Sep 29, 10:36:28
- Lol (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:36:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.