Well since we've made subs in every game and we've got 20 points presumably
the answer is 20. As I have said above though I don't think you can credit the substitutions with "consolidating" the points when they have often made us play worse.
Posted By: Jim on September 29th 2016 at 10:54:52
Message Thread
- What would people generally expect the effect of substitutions to be on games (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 09:51:24
- Out of interest ... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:02:42
- Well I can tell you that this season (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:13:26
- How many have we consolidated what we had? Like Forest? (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:26:00
- Exactly that doesn't suit his agenda though does it (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:31:31
- Depends what you mean by consolidated? (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:37:25
- Points (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:38:42
- Points exactly this (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:40:11
- As i said previously last night is the only time its costs us points (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:46:57
- Yes, but how many points consolidated when subs been made? (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:49:45
- Well since we've made subs in every game and we've got 20 points presumably (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:54:52
- Doesn't sound too shabby then really. 20 secured, 3 lost. (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 11:07:50
- Hardly secured. In many cases i would say jeopardised (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 11:19:39
- Well maybe you would, but the image you're trying to create is that (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 11:28:14
- No I'm just saying they rarely improve us or positively impact on the game (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 12:05:22
- Well maybe you would, but the image you're trying to create is that (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 11:28:14
- Hardly secured. In many cases i would say jeopardised (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 11:19:39
- Doesn't sound too shabby then really. 20 secured, 3 lost. (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 11:07:50
- He will ignore that just as he is choosing... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:53:52
- And without the Mulumbu sub at Ipswich we probably win the game (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:55:46
- Manager in some right some wrong shocker (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:58:30
- And without the Mulumbu sub at Ipswich we probably win the game (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:55:46
- Well since we've made subs in every game and we've got 20 points presumably (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:54:52
- Yes, but how many points consolidated when subs been made? (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:49:45
- As i said previously last night is the only time its costs us points (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:46:57
- Points exactly this (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:40:11
- Points (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:38:42
- Depends what you mean by consolidated? (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:37:25
- Exactly that doesn't suit his agenda though does it (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:31:31
- It's a simplistic way of looking at things though ... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:20:16
- We are grinding our results without playing well I will give him that (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:30:50
- So much nonsense ... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:35:54
- We are grinding our results without playing well I will give him that (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:30:50
- Sorry that should say underwhelming not overwhelming (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:14:38
- How many have we consolidated what we had? Like Forest? (n/m) (NCFC) - Azteca, Sep 29, 10:26:00
- Well I can tell you that this season (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 29, 10:13:26
- Out of interest ... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 29, 10:02:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.